Feminism And Gender Equality

Overall, the rights and status of women have improved considerably in the last 

century; however, gender equality has recently been threatened within the last decade.  

Blatantly sexist laws and practices are slowly being eliminated while social perceptions of 

"women's roles" continue to stagnate and even degrade back to traditional ideals.  It is 

these social perceptions that challenge the evolution of women as equal on all levels.  In 

this study, I will argue that subtle and blatant sexism continues to exist throughout 

educational, economic, professional and legal arenas.  

        Women who carefully follow their expected roles may never recognize sexism as 

an oppressive force in their life.  I find many parallels between women's experiences in the 

nineties with Betty Friedan's, in her essay: The Way We Were - 1949. She dealt with a 

society that expected women to fulfill certain roles.  Those roles completely disregarded 

the needs of educated and motivated business women and scientific women.  Actually, the 

subtle message that society gave was that the educated woman was actually selfish and 

evil.

I remember in particular the searing effect on a friend of mine who once intended to be a 

psychologist, of a story in and old McCall's magizine dated December 1949 called "A Weekend with Daddy."  

A little girl who lives a lonely life with her mother, divorced, an intellectual know-it-all 

psychologist, goes to the country to spend a weekend with her father and his new wife, 

who is wholesome, happy, and a good cook and gardener.  And there is love and 

laughter and growing flowers and hot clams and a gourmet cheese omelet and square 

dancing, and she doesn't want to go home.  But, pitying her poor mother typing away all 

by herself in the lonesome apartment, she keeps her guilty secret that from now on she 

will be living for the moments when she can escape to that dream home in the country 

where they know "what life is all about." 

        I have often consulted my parents' freinds about their experiences, and I find their 

historical perspective enlightening.  My mother's best friend was pregnant with her third child in 

1949.  Her work experience included: interior design and modeling women's clothes for 

the Sears catalog.  I asked her to read the Friedan essay and let me know if she felt as 

moved as I was, and to share with me her experiences of sexism.  Her immediate reaction 

was to point out that "Betty Friedan was a college educated woman and she had certain 

goals that never interested me."  This lady, though growing up during a time 

when women had few social rights, said she didn't experience oppressive sexism in her 

life.  However, when she describes her life accomplishments, I feel she has spent most of 

her life fulfilling the expected roles of women instead of pursuing goals that were mostly 

reserved for men.  Unknowingly, her life was controlled by traditional, sexist values 

prevalent in her time and still prevalent today.   

        Twenty-four years after the above article from McCall's magazine was written, the 

Supreme Court decided whether women should have a right to an abortion in Roe v. 

Wade.  I believe the decision was made in favor of women's rights 

mostly because the court made a progressive decision to consider the woman as a human 

who may be motivated by other things in life than just being a mother.  Justice Blackmun 

delivered the following opinion:

Maternity, or additional offspring, may force upon the woman a distressful life and 

future.  Psychological harm may be imminent.  Mental and physical health may be taxed 

by child care.  There is also a distress, for all concerned, associated with the unwanted 

child, and there is the problem of bringing a child into a family already unable, 

psychologically and otherwise, to care for it.  In other cases, as in this one, the 

additional difficulties and continuing stigma of unwed motherhood may be involved. 

        I feel the court decision of Roe v. Wade would not have been made in 1949.  

Even in 1973, it was a progressive decision, which the Bush administraction is trying to overturn by using every means at its disposal,
including packing the Supreme Court with anti-choice justices.

  Abortion has existed for the entire history of the world, but had never been addressed because 

discussing these issues was not socially acceptable.  A culture of not discussing issues that 

have a profound impact on women is a culture that encourages women to be powerless.

The right of abortion became a major issue.  Before 1970, about a million abortions were 

done every year, of which only about ten thousand were legal.  Perhaps a third of the 

women having illegal abortions - mostly poor people - had to be hospitalized for 

complications.  How many thousands died as a result of these illegal abortions no one 

really knows.  But the illegalization of abortion clearly worked against the poor, for the 

rich could manage either to have their baby or to have their abortion under safe 

conditions. 

        A critic of the women's movement would quickly remind us that women have a 

right to decline marriage and sex, and pursue their individual interests.  However, I would 

argue that the social pressure women must endure if they do not conform to their expected 

role is unfair.  The problem goes beyond social conformity and crosses into government 

intervention (or lack thereof).  The 1980's "reagan Revolution" saw the pendulum swing against the women's 

movement.  Violent acts against women who sought abortions became common and the 

government was unsympathetic to the victims.  There are parallels between the Southern 

Black's civil rights movement and the women's movement: Blacks have long been 

accustomed to the white government being unsympathetic to violent acts against them.  

During the civil rights movement, legal action seemed only to come when a white civil 

rights activist was killed.  Women are facing similar disregard presently, and their 

movement is truly one for civil rights.

A national campaign by the National Organization of Women began on 2 March 1984, 

demanding that the US Justice Department investigate anti-abortion terrorism.  On 1 

August federal authorities finally agreed to begin to monitor the violence.  However, 

Federal Bureau of Investigation director, William Webster, declared that he saw no 

evidence of "terrorism."  Only on 3 January 1985, in a pro-forma statement, did the 

President criticize the series of bombings as "violent anarchist acts" but he still refused 

to term them "terrorism."  Reagan deferred to Moral Majoritarian Jerry Falwell's 

subsequent campaign to have fifteen million Americans wear "armbands" on 22 January 

1985, "one for every legal abortion" since 1973.  Falwell's anti-abortion outburst 

epitomized Reaganism's orientation: "We can no longer passively and quietly wait for 

the Supreme Court to change their mind or for Congress to pass a law."  Extremism on 

the right was no vice, moderation no virtue.  Or, as Hitler explained in Mein Kampf, 

"The very first essential for success is a perpetually constant and regular employment of 

violence." 

        This mentality continued on through 1989 during the Webster v. Reproductive 

Health Services case.  "The Reagan Administration had urged the Supreme Court
 to use this case as the basis for overturning Roe v. Wade." 

        It is disturbing that the slow gains achieved by the women's movement are so volatile 

and endangered when conservative administrations gain a majority in government.  To put the 

problem into perspective: a woman's right to have an abortion in this country did not 

come until 1973. Less than two decades later, the president of the United States is pushing 

to take that right away.  It seems blatant that society is bent on putting women in their 

places.

        From the above examples, it appears American culture prefers women as non-

professional, non-intellectual, homemakers and mothers.  This mentality is not easily 

resolved, because it is introduced at a young age.  Alice Brooks experienced inequality on 

the basis of her race and her sex. In her autobiography, A Dream Deferred, she recalls the 

reaction of her father when she brought up the idea of college to him:

 "I found a scholarship for veterans' children and asked my father to sign and furnish 

proof that he was a veteran.  He refused and told me that I was only going to get married 

and have babies.  I needed to stay home and help my mother with her kids.  My brother 

needed college to support a family.  Not only was I not going to get any help, I was also 

tagged as selfish because I wanted to go to college."

        This is another example of women being labeled as selfish for wanting the same 

opportunities as men.  Alice Brooks is a very courageous woman; seemingly able to 

overcome any oppression she may encounter.  During her presentation to our class, she 

said that "women who succeed in male dominated fields are never mediocre - they are 

extraordinary achievers."  Her insight encapsulates much of the subtle sexism that exists 

today.  I feel that no one can truly be equal in a society when only the "extraordinary 

achievers" are allowed to succeed out of their expected social role.  

        This attitude of rising blatant and subtle attacks on women's civil rights is further 

exemplified in recent reactions to affirmative action plans. These plans have been devised 

to try to give women and minorities an opportunity to participate in traditionally white 

male dominated areas.  However, we see the same trends in legal action for the use of 

affirmative action plans as we saw in the 1980's backlash against the Roe v. Wade 

decision.  A few interesting points were presented in the case, Johnson v. 

Transportation Agency, Santa Clara .  Mr. Paul E. Johnson filed 

suit against the Santa Clara County Transportation Agency when he was denied a 

promotion, feeling the company's affirmative action plan denied him of his civil rights.  

Some interesting facts were presented in this case:

Specifically, 9 of the 10 Para-Professionals and 110 of the 145 Office and Clerical 

Workers were women.  By contrast, women were only 2 of the 28 Officials and 

Administrators, 5 of the 58 Professionals, 12 of the 124 Technicians, none of the Skilled 

Crafts Workers, and 1 - who was Joyce - of the 110 Road Maintenance Workers.  

        The above statistics show women have been considerably underrepresented at the 

Santa Clara County Transportation Agency.  These numbers are not uncommon and are 

found throughout business.  It is interesting to note the current popular perception is that 

affirmative action precludes white males from finding employment with companies that 

implement these plans.  The truth is in the numbers, however.  The fact that Mr. Johnson 

felt he was denied his civil rights because an equally qualified woman was given a 

promotion, instead of him, is just a small window into the subtle sexism that exists today.  

Most critics of affirmative action do not consider the grossly unequal numbers of men in 

management and professional positions.  Secondly, it never seems an issue of debate that a 

woman may have had no other previous life opportunities in these male dominated areas.  

I do not intend to argue that affirmative action is good or bad, but only wish to point out 

that the current backlash against these programs is heavily rooted in sexism and racism.  

        Often blatant violence or unfair acts against a group of people will cause that 

group to pull together and empower themselves against their oppressors.  The women's 

movement has made large steps to eliminate many of these blatantly sexist acts in the last 

century.  Now the real difficulty is upon us: subtle acts of sexism and the degrading social 

roles of women in today's conservative culture.  Alice Brooks so eloquently described her 

experiences with inequality, stating, "the worse pain came from those little things people 

said or did to me."  As these "little things" accumulate in the experience of a young 

woman, she increasingly finds herself powerless in her relationships, employment, 

economics, and society in general.  The female child has as many goals as the male child, 

but statistically she is unable to realize these goals because of the obstacles that society 

sets in front of her.  Society and media attempt to create an illusion that women have 

every right that men enjoy.  However, women will never be equal until the day female 

scientists, intellectuals, professionals, military leaders, and politicians are just as accepted 

and encouraged to participate in all of society's arenas as males.